Lawyers who embrace AI have much to gain—but they must use these tools on their own terms
Lawyers must personalize AI tools rather than relying on standardized solutions to maximize benefits and maintain professional differentiation.Summary
The article argues that lawyers should actively learn to use AI tools themselves rather than relying on pre-built, one-size-fits-all solutions. While AI adoption in law is growing rapidly, with companies like Harvey and Legora offering standardized tools, these products limit customization and fail to harness AI's full potential. The author, a partner at Trilegal, shares his experience of building personalized AI workflows for drafting, research, and administrative tasks, emphasizing that self-directed learning is critical. He contends that law firms are adopting AI incorrectly by prioritizing existing workflows over personalization, which hinders innovation. The key takeaway is that lawyers who invest time in understanding and adapting AI tools will gain a competitive edge, as AI's true value lies in its ability to be tailored to individual needs.
(Source：Livemint)