Restriction vs regulation: As SC seeks expert panel, how legal fraternity views use of AI in court
The Supreme Court is forming an expert panel to address concerns over AI-generated fake cases and citations affecting judicial integrity, with legal experts debating regulation versus restriction of AI use.Summary
The Supreme Court has initiated the formation of an expert panel to tackle the misuse of AI-generated, non-existent case laws and citations in court proceedings, which threaten judicial integrity. The case originated from a property dispute where a trial court relied on AI-created judgments, leading to scrutiny by higher courts. Legal professionals, including senior advocates, have raised alarms about the risks of AI hallucinations, where AI tools generate convincing but fabricated legal references. Experts like Rajshekhar Rao and Gopal Sankaranarayanan emphasize the need for strict accountability, such as QR codes for citations and absolute liability for lawyers citing AI-generated content. Others, like Arpit Goel, argue for regulation rather than restriction, highlighting AI's potential as a tool if used responsibly. The debate underscores the necessity for legal practitioners to verify AI outputs and integrate safeguards to prevent misconduct, ensuring accountability in the evolving technological landscape of law.
(Source：Theprint)